Congratulations To Sergio A. White, Lawyers With Purpose Member Of The Month

March 2, 2015

by Lawyers With Purpose with No Comment Coaching & Implementation Estate Planning Drafting Software Systems & Processes Team Building

What is the greatest success you’ve had since joining Lawyers With Purpose?

Thanks to the Lawyers With Purpose systems and processes, our biggest success has been being able to get up to speed very quickly in an area of law that is so important. The support from Lawyers With Purpose in the form of the Live ListServ for any practice related questions; and and the webinars designed to keep us abreast of changes in the area of elder law and estate planning have made the transition back into full time practice smooth for me and beneficial for my clients.

What is your favorite Lawyers With Purpose tool?

My Favorite Lawyers With Purpose tool is by far the LWP-CCS (estate planning drafting software). I really enjoy sitting down in front of the computer and punching in the numbers to help come up with a Medicaid-Qualification strategy for my clients. Then going through the client questionnaire to build the trust and other estate documents is also something I enjoy doing very much.

How has being part of Lawyers With Purpose impacted your team and your practice?

Being a part of the Lawyers With Purpose team for me has been transformative. Having returned to practicing law after several years in education, I have found in Lawyers With Purpose a family of likeminded individuals who truly care about the work they are doing and the clients they serve. It is very satisfying to me to be able to help a family in crisis preserve the legacy that they worked so hard to build, and ensure that it will be there for their family. Through Lawyers With Purpose, I have met and befriended many people who will be part of my life for many years to come.

What You Need To Know About Using Personal Care Plans

February 25, 2015

by David Zumpano with No Comment Estate Planning Drafting Software Legal Technical

How does a personal care plan differ from a healthcare proxy, healthcare power of attorney or a living will? There are two distinctions between the various healthcare directives offered; One, grants authority, expression of personal wishes. A healthcare proxy or healthcare power of attorney grants legal authority to someone else to make medical and healthcare decisions on one’s behalf. A living will and personal care plan, on the other hand, are a mere expression of the wishes one would like to have happen in the event of their inability to make their own healthcare or medical decisions but does not grant authority to anyone to do anything. It is also important to further distinguish the difference between a living will and personal care plan. A living will traditionally identifies as want end of life healthcare preferences. Typically these relate to resuscitation, blood transfusions, incubation, and the like. Typically one initials each treatment you do not want or signs an overall statement states none be performed. The shortfall of a living will is it only deals with "end of life" medical decisions. A personal care plan, on the other hand, identifies your preference regarding lifetime care, after one becomes unable to make their own decisions.

The LWP™ client centered personal care plan allows clients to identify how often they would like their hair done, the maintenance of their oral hygiene, what they would like to do for entertainment, and hobbies, what to watch on TV, favorite books or authors, foods they commonly eat or do not like to eat, drinks, or continuation of habitual patterns accustomed to (i.e., a glass of wine at night with dinner).

A personal care plan also expresses wishes for attending family events and the terms and conditions of attending them. Most provide that, in attending family events, they are not a "burden" to their loved ones and are able to "derive enjoyment" from it. A personal care plan also provides instructions regarding end of life and integrates all wishes expressed with the authorities granted in the healthcare proxy or healthcare power of attorney. A properly drafted personal care plan also addresses the client's feelings on organ donation, and even funeral and burial instructions. Another great use of personal care plans are for disabled children, created by their parent or guardian to ensure their needs are provided after the parent’s ability to do so.

Now that we are clear on what a personal plan is, is it enforceable? Most states have laws providing that written expression of wishes shall be considered in the care of those who write them. The real question is can you ensure someone will do it? The best way to ensure the plan is followed is to integrate the personal care plan with the clients trust to require the trustee to carry out all of its terms set out in the personal care plan. Allowing the trustee to utilize the assets of the trust, can ensure one’s wishes are maintained. But on a more practical level, a personal care plan serves as a set of instructions for the family so they feel helpful in the care provided for their loved one. A properly drawn personal care plan is a great tool to ensure the client is receiving the care designed as outlined in the personal care plan and more importantly alleviates the stress and guilt for those that love the individual to help provide them what the individual had hoped. Having a personal care plan, clearly beats hanging out in a wheelchair all day in front of a TV.

Don't you agree?

If you want to learn more about Lawyers With Purpose and what we have to offer, join our Thursday, March 12th at 4EST or 7EST for our "Having The Time To Have It All… 3 Time Strategies To Have A Practice With Profit And Purpose".

If you're a Lawyers With Purpose member you already have access to this information on the members website!

David J. Zumpano, Esq, CPA, Co-founder Lawyers With Purpose, Founder and Senior Partner of Estate Planning Law Center

Bigstock-Marketing-background--Break-E-69885466

Knowing The Breakeven Point… A Must When Pre-Planning!

February 18, 2015

by David Zumpano with No Comment Asset Protection Estate Planning Drafting Software

When Medicaid planning, many practitioners focus on the look back date and the penalty period to identify the best strategy to ensure Medicaid eligibility in the shortest period of time. While that may be true for crisis planning, when preplanning for Medicaid benefits, the look forward period and the breakeven date are critical factors to become eligible in the shortest period of time.

When pre‑planning, practitioners must strategize on two premises; (1) what the worst case scenario would be (if the client fell ill the day after pre‑planning is completed) and compare that to (2) the best case scenario, which occurs when the client stays healthy for 60 months. While crisis practitioners focus on the look back date and review of financial records for the previous 60 months, pre‑planning practitioners must focus on the date of a conveyance (uncompensated transfer) and "look forward" 60 months to determine the timeframe in which the the transfer will be in the purview of a future Medicaid application. Understanding the distinction between the look-back period and the look forward period is critical in determining the breakeven date when preplanning for future Medicaid benefits.

So, what is the breakeven date? It is the date, when pre-planning, that if it is reached, it will be better to wait out the 60 months from the original conveyance date than to convert to a crisis case. The breakeven date is calculated by determining the worst case scenario and comparing it to the best case scenario. The worst case scenario is if the client fell ill the day after pre‑planning was completed. What would be the best case scenario in such an event? To determine that, you would calculate as if it were a crisis case, and determine the "minimum months to qualify", the soonest period in which you would be able to get the client eligible for Medicaid if they came in in crisis. Once you have calculated the minimum months to qualify, and then compare it to the best case scenario, if the client had stayed healthy for sixty months. The breakeven point is simply the best case minus the worst case. Restated the best case is remaining healthy 60 months (the entire look forward period) and the worst case is if it were a crisis case and you calculate the minimum months to qualify.

Let's give an example. Assume a client came into you in crisis and after doing your calculations you are able to determine that you can get them qualified for Medicaid in 23 months. This is done by transferring assets and reserving enough assets to pay through the 23 month ineligibility period. It's pretty straightforward in a crisis case. Assume now the same exact client came in, but was healthy. In preplanning case you would calculate what would happen if the client were in crisis (like we just presumed) and then compare it to the best case scenario (they stay healthy 60 months). In this pre‑planning case the breakeven date would be 37 months (60 minus the minimum months to qualify of 23 months) from when the preplanning was completed.

Therefore in a pre‑planning case if the need for nursing home care occurred within 37 months, you would convert the pre‑planning case to a crisis case at that time and get them qualified in 23 months. If however, the client's need for nursing home care occurred after month 37 (the breakeven point), then instead of converting to a crisis case, you would privately pay until the 60^th month after the original transfer (look forward date). Sounds confusing, but it's really quite simple once you understand these new terms.

To learn about these key terms join our FREE Webinar February 24th on Simplifying Medicaid Eligibility & & Qualified Transfers.

Here's just some of what you'll discover…

Understanding the 12 Key terms of Medicaid
Learn the Qualification Standards: Does Client Meet Needs Tests?
Learn the Medicaid Terms of Art
Learn the Snap Shot, Look Back/Look Forward Distinction: And how to put it all together
At the end of the event receive an ALL STATES Medicaid Planning Resource Guide
…and much, much more!

Just click here to register to reserve your seat… it's 100% FREE!

And you can learn how the LWP-CCS™ Medicaid software can calculate both crisis and preplanning strategies optimal to every client fact pattern: and simplify this otherwise confusing planning opportunity!

David J. Zumpano, Esq, CPA, Co-founder Lawyers With Purpose, Founder and Senior Partner of Estate Planning Law Center

6a019b000cafc8970b01a73dd558f5970d-320wi

First Four Memberships FREE For Joining This DocuBank Webinar!

February 15, 2015

by Lawyers With Purpose with No Comment Estate Planning Drafting Software

Sign up for this exclusive LWP webinar to learn about how you can enhance your firm and protect your clients with DocuBank.

When you attend this webinar, your first four memberships will be FREE. Lawyers With Purpose members enjoy a substantial discount, waived setup fee, and turnkey implementation thanks to LWP software integration.

DocuBank is the leading document-access solution utilized by thousands of estate planning professionals across the country. Clients receive an Emergency Card for 24/7/365 access to their advance directives and an online SAFE for convenient access to their entire estate plan.

You'll also learn about the numerous integrated marketing features for your firm including ongoing touches with your clients that help solidify your lasting client relationships.

Join us Tuesday, February 17th at 2:00 EST. Click here to register now.

Roslyn Drotar, Coaching, Consulting & Implementation – Lawyers With Purpose

Bigstock-School-Kids-on-a-Chalkboard-14563127

How To Know When An SNT Needs A Tax ID Number

February 12, 2015

by David Zumpano with No Comment Asset Protection Estate Planning Drafting Software Legal Technical SNT

The question among many practitioners is, does a supplemental needs trust need a separate tax I.D. number and have to file a separate income tax return? The answer is, it depends. So let's examine when an SNT needs a separate tax I.D. and when it doesn’t.

A supplemental needs trust will be a first party or third party trust. A first party supplemental needs trust is funded with assets of the disabled individual who is also the beneficiary of the trust. Under law a first party supplemental needs trust can only be created by the parent or grandparent of the individual, or a court. Once the first party supplemental needs trust is created, it will not require a separate tax I.D. number, but instead will use the tax I.D. number of the disabled beneficiary. All income earned by the first party supplemental needs trust will be reported on the income tax return of the disabled beneficiary, but will not affect or be counted toward their continuing eligibility, as long as distributions are made on the beneficiary’s behalf and not made directly to the beneficiary.

A third party supplemental needs trust is created and funded by someone other than the disabled beneficiary, but for the benefit of a disabled beneficiary. Whether a tax I.D. number is required for the third party SNT will depend upon how the trust is structured. In most third party SNT’s, the creator of the trust (grantor) wishes to maintain control of the trust for the benefit of the disabled beneficiary. In this case, no separate tax I.D. number would be required as it would be considered a "grantor" trust and all income would be taxed to the grantor. If the grantor is not the trustee, but retains other identified rights, then the same rules would apply. Alternatively, if the grantor creates a trust and retains no rights to change it, benefit from it or control its distribution, then it may be a non‑grantor trust and need a separate tax identification number.

Similarly, after the grantor who created the trust and retained rights to make it a grantor trust dies, the third party supplemental needs trust now becomes a "non‑grantor trust" and requires a separate tax identification number. Annual income tax returns would have to be filed for non-grantor SNT’s but the actual tax will be deemed payable by either the beneficiary, or the trust, depending upon the actual distributions made. For example, if a supplemental needs trust earned $10,000.00 in a year, and they used $7,000.00 of it for the beneficiary, it would "pass through" the $7,000.00 in taxable income to the beneficiary on a Form K1. The remaining $3,000.00 retained in the trust, would be taxed at the trust tax rate and payable by the trustee directly with the tax return filed by the trust with the IRS. Finally, in relation to IRAs, the IRS has ruled in Private Letter Ruling 200820026, that an IRA payable to a supplemental needs trust at the death of the IRA owner, will not be required to be liquidated and, but instead, the age of the disabled beneficiary will be used for "stretch purposes" and it will be considered a grantor trust of the beneficiary for purposes of the IRA distribution.

So does a supplemental needs trust need a tax I.D. number? No and yes it all depends how you create the trust during lifetime and how you plan for it!

If you are interested in learning more about estate planning and more specifically on the iPug Business Planning, join us February 12th at 8 EST where we'll talk about:

Learning the difference between General Asset Protection, DAPT Protection, Medicaid Protection and iPug® Protection
Comprehensive outline of the 2 primary iPug® Business Protection Strategies
Learn why clients choose single purpose Irrevocable Pure Grantor Trusts™ over LLCs
Learn how it all comes down to Funding

And much much more… Click here to register now!

David J. Zumpano, Esq, CPA, Co-founder Lawyers With Purpose, Founder and Senior Partner of Estate Planning Law Center

Bigstock-Happy-Senior-Couple-From-Behin-47944529

How To Plan For The Home The Right Way

February 11, 2015

by David Zumpano with No Comment Asset Protection Estate Planning Drafting Software Legal Technical

A major question comes up often during estate planning for seniors in determining what to do with the primary residence. There are many choices, but the actual selection will depend heavily on the ultimate goal of the client. Typical client goals include basic estate planning, probate avoidance, home management in the event of incompetency, benefits planning (Medicaid/VA), asset protection planning, and estate and income tax planning. Let's review strategies in each of these situations.

The most common form of ownership of the primary residence by a husband and wife is as tenants by the entirety or similar legal ownership. By state law, this provides asset protection during life as 100 percent of the property will convey to the surviving spouse without any liens attached by a deceased spouse’s liabilities. Obviously for single individuals no asset protection is provided and non-spousal joint tenancy may protect the assets for the surviving joint tenant, subject only to Medicaid and IRS's right to recovery. The most typical funding strategy is to transfer the primary residence to a revocable living trust (RLT) to avoid probate. Some states also allow payable-on-death deeds (ladybird deeds) or heirship deeds. While funding the home to a revocable trust or these other strategies avoid probate and could provide post death asset protection (RLT), they do not effectively provide protection "during life".

Another primary strategy is to convey the home to an irrevocable trust. These are typically done when clients are interested in estate tax savings or asset protection. The primary question relates to whether the irrevocable trust is a "grantor trust" or a "non-grantor trust” for tax purposes. Traditionally, estate tax reduction trusts are non-grantor trusts and the home would maintain its "carry over tax basis" to the beneficiaries of the trust thereby creating a capital gains tax on the difference between the sales value and the original price paid by the grantor who conveyed it to the trust. In contrast, a grantor trust that retains rights that include the value of the irrevocable trust in the estate of the deceased grantor, would receive a "step up" in basis after the death of the grantor. While these serve estate and income tax needs, they often may conflict with benefits planning, such as for Medicaid and/or veterans' benefits. In addition, one must be cautious in conveying a principle residence to a RLT or irrevocable trust as it could defeat any real property tax exemptions. The client is eligible for when the property is owned in the client’s name. You need to confirm with your local assessor on the impact of the credits upon funding the home to the trust chosen.

Medicaid and veterans' benefits, on the other hand, have additional restrictions above and beyond the tax and legal restrictions regarding trusts. Putting a personal residence in an irrevocable trust for Medicaid can provide asset protection during lifetime but doing so creates a uncompensated transfer which affects future eligibility. Another question in funding the personal residence is whether to retain a reserved life estate in the deed and convey the remainder to the trust or to convey the whole residence to the trust and maintain a right for the grantor to live there inside the trust document. This is often avoids the loss of any real property tax credits but if the home is sold during the grantor’s lifetime, then the grantor's pro rata ownership (lifetime interest) proceeds would be considered “available” in determining the grantor's ongoing Medicaid eligibility.

In contrast to Medicaid planning, planning for VA benefits has additional considerations. A veteran can convey their home to an irrevocable “grantor” trust without consequence. The caution, however, is if the residence is sold during the grantor's lifetime and converted to an income producing asset (cash, stocks, ect.) it would thereafter trigger the asset value in determining the veteran's future benefit eligibility.

Planning for the home appears simple but is absolutely essential that the overall client goal is identified before determining where to fund the home. Understanding these strategies are essential.

If you would like to learn more about irrevocable trust (iPug Trust) join our FREE webinar Thursday, February 12th at 8 EST click here to register now. During this webinar you'll discover:

Learn the difference between General Asset Protection, DAPT Protection, Medicaid Protection and iPug® Protection
Comprehensive outline of the 2 primary iPug® Protection Strategies
Learn why clients choose single purpose Irrevocable Pure Grantor Trusts™ over LLCs
Learn how it all comes down to Funding

Click here to register. We'll see you then!

David J. Zumpano, Esq, CPA, Co-founder Lawyers With Purpose, Founder and Senior Partner of Estate Planning Law Center

The Veterans Administration Proposes 3 Year Look Back On Gifts

January 28, 2015

by Lawyers With Purpose with 3 Comments Asset Protection Estate Planning Drafting Software Legal Technical VA

On Friday, January 23, 2015, the VA issued proposed new Veterans Administration regulations that would penalize wartime veterans up to ten years for making gifts of assets for less than fair market value. The VA is trying to stop what they perceive as lawyers and financial advisors “taking advantage of veterans” when helping them strategically plan to preserve assets and qualify for the Improved Pension benefit.

The proposed changes in regulations would:

Establish a 3 year look back for gifts
Impose penalties for up to 10 years
Create a bright-line net worth standard of $119,220, which includes annual income
Deny any expenses related to independent living facilities as care costs
Require Veterans to sell their home place property if the lot coverage exceeds 2 acres.

How will this work? When a veteran or widow of a veteran applies for the Improved Pension with Aid and Attendance, the VA will ask if any transfers of assets for less than fair market value have been made in the three years prior to the application. If so, the VA will presume it was for the purpose of meeting the VA eligibility standards.

Penalized gifts include gifts of money or assets to children or others, establishing estate plans with the use of trusts, and establishing retirement plans through the use of annuities which can provide a life time income stream.

When a gift has been determined to have happened during the look back period, the VA will calculate the penalty by dividing the value of the gift by the claimant’s pension rate with aid and attendance. Each classification of claimant varies, thus, the penalty periods will be different depending on who makes the claim. The pension rates with aid and attendance are as follows:

(1) Married veteran = $2,120

(2) Single veteran = $1,788

(3) Widow = $1,149

Thus, if a married veteran gives away $15,000 and a widow gives away $15,000, the widow is penalized almost double that of the veteran. (Married veteran $15,000 divided by $2,120 = 7 month penalty; widow $15,000 divided by $1,149 = 13 month penalty.)

Also, because the “net worth” standard will include income, high income earners will be allowed to have low to no savings for emergency items; whereas, very low income earners will be permitted to keep much more in savings. Because of the strict ruling on how the VA plans to define “medical care,” veterans who have dementia, Alzheimer’s Disease or other degenerative diseases and live in independent living facilities because they no longer drive and need a safe environment in which to live, will not be eligible for the benefits because they may not yet the hands on care for bathing, dressing, eating, toileting or transferring (ADLs). Although they are unsafe to live at home due to their health care condition of cognitive decline, the VA refuses to consider any expenses of care for a facility as deductible from the claimant’s income unless the claimant needs assistance with no less than 2 ADLs.

Between 2012 and 2014, Congress introduced two different bills, each imposing a three year look back penalty. Both bills were died. Nevertheless, the VA is moving forward on their own to create the look back and penalties. These changes will not only hurt wartime veterans, specifically WWII and Korean war vets, but it will further exacerbate the enormous claims back logs that already exist.

To fight this from happening, everyone who cares about a veteran must respond. Public comments must be received no later than March 24, 2015 and can be sent through http://www.regulations.gov or by mail or hand-delivery to: Director, Regulation Policy and Management (02REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273-9026. Comments must include that they are in response to “RIN 2900-AO73, Net Worth, Asset Transfers, and Income Exclusions for Needs-Based Benefits.”

Victoria L. Collier, Veteran of the United States Air Force, 1989-1995 and United States Army Reserves, 2001-2004. Victoria is a Certified Elder Law Attorney through the National Elder Law Foundation, Author of 47 Secret Veterans Benefits for Seniors, Author of Paying for Long Term Care: Financial Help for Wartime Veterans: The VA Aid & Attendance Benefit, Founder of The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC, Co-Founder of Lawyers for Wartime Veterans, Co-Founder of Veterans Advocate Group of America.

If are in the Charlotte NC, area, or will be attending our Practice With Purpose Program or our Tri Annual Practice Enhancement Retreat, consider joining Victoria for her Specialty Program on Wednesday, February 4th, and get your initial VA Accreditation through the VA. If you provide legal advice to Veterans about specific VA claims, to include drafting asset protection trusts for VA Benefit qualifications, you MUST be accredited by the VA. Contact Molly Hall at mhall@lawyerswithpurpose.com for registration information.

** Before attending this course, you must have submitted an Application for Accreditation, VA Form 21a, to the Office of General Counsel and received approval.

Bigstock-Tip-of-fountain-pen-marking-da-48743531

How To Distinguish The Snapshot Date From The Look Back Date

January 27, 2015

by David Zumpano with One Comment Asset Protection Estate Planning Drafting Software Legal Technical

Many lawyers doing Medicaid qualification for their clients often get confused between the snapshot date and lookback date. These dates are not only confused by lawyers, but also often by the Medicaid departments processing the application. So let's set it straight. 42 US 1396r-5 (c) states the snapshot date occurs on the first day of the month in which a Medicaid applicant reached thirty days of "continuous institutionalization". Continuous institutionalization is identified as thirty consecutive days in an institution of care. These include hospitals, nursing homes, VA facilities, or the like.

If an individual enters a hospital on January 15, is discharged on January 30, enters a nursing home on February 5, and applies for Medicaid on March 1, no snapshot date has occurred. Why? It's simple. Thirty continuous days of institutionalization has not occurred by March 1. By virtue of the discharge from the hospital on January 30 and readmission to the nursing home on February 5, a lag occurred, restarting the 30 day period. Since they entered the nursing home February 5, and applied March 1, no snapshot date is set because thirty continuous days has not occurred.

Continuing, if the client stays in the nursing home through March 5, then the snapshot date would be February 1, the first day of the month in which the applicant entered a facility for thirty days of continuous institutionalization. The significance of the snapshot date is it represents the date Medicaid will look at all financial assets owned by the Medicaid applicant and spouse in determining whether or not they are eligible for benefits. In this case, Medicaid would take a "snapshot" of all assets owned by the applicant and spouse on February 1 and use this information to determine the client's individual resource allowance, the community spouse resource allowance, and the client's net available monthly income that can be used for the cost of care.

What makes all this confusing is, although the federal statute is clear as outlined above, most states treat the “lookback date”, as the "snapshot date." The lookback date is entirely different; it is the date when applicant resides in a nursing home AND applies for Medicaid benefits. In this case the lookback date does not occur until the Medicaid applicant applies for Medicaid. Since they are already in the nursing home, they would have to apply for benefits to establish the lookback date.

In this case, if an application was filed, the lookback date would also be March 1, the first day of the month of application after admission. In many cases clients come to you long after the snapshot date and in many cases may have been residing in a nursing home for many, many months, before they apply for Medicaid so no lookback has been established. The lookback date has a use and different significance than the snapshot date. While the snapshot is used to calculate all the allowable exemptions, the lookback date is used to establish the date at which Medicaid will look back sixty months at all financial data of an applicant to determine if there were any uncompensated transfers.

Understanding these key definitions is critical in having an effective Medicaid practice, but more importantly, to get your clients confident they will be eligible in the timeframe you identify. To learn more about Asset Protection and Medicaid Planning for your estate or elder law practice, consider joining us next week in Charlotte, NC, for our Practice With Purpose Program. We'll be covering this and so much more just on Day 1! We'll also be allowing a test drive in the room to review our drafting software!

David J. Zumpano, Esq, CPA, Co-founder Lawyers With Purpose, Founder and Senior Partner of Estate Planning Law Center

When To Dismantle ILIT’s For Today’s Clients

January 21, 2015

by David Zumpano with No Comment Estate Planning Drafting Software Legal Technical

I meet with many clients who come in and have an ILIT, (Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust), which was set up in the 1990s or 2000s as part of their estate plan. ILIT’s are typically used when a client is subject to Estate tax and wants to ensure the value of life insurance is not taxed in their estate. They were much more popular in the 90’s and early 2000’s when the estate tax limits were much lower. The question is, are they still needed?

A strong argument can be made that a vast majority of clients (99.8 percent) who have ILITs no longer need them because the estate tax levels have risen to a point where they only affect 2 out of 1,000 clients. So, what do we do with the old ILIT?

One strategy is to continue them and let them play out as intended. A second option is to dissolve the trust under state law, get the insurance policy and any cash value back to the grantor and have the grantor create a new irrevocable pure grantor trust that would ensure asset protection for the grantor but allow the grantor full control, as trustee, the ability to modify it as to any and all changes make other than making it available back to the grantor. The greatest benefit however is that it would allow the grantor to add other assets to the trust to benefit those intended now, during life rather than just after the grantor’s death.

There are two key steps to dissolve an irrevocable trust. First, to identify your state law for termination of an irrevocable trust, typically, by the consent of all the parties. Second, to identify under the state statutes who the beneficial interest would go to, that is back to the grantor, or to the beneficiaries. If there's a way to get it back to the grantor that yields the greatest result so the grantor's life insurance and other assets can be combined and utilized for the benefit of the grantor's beneficiaries during lifetime and after death with full complete asset protection and complete access and control by the beneficiaries. If your state statute requires the ILIT be distributed to the beneficiaries, then the key would be to identify the fewest number of beneficiaries and have them receive the benefits and create a "third party irrevocable pure grant trust" (otherwise known as a KIT™). Under this strategy the benefits could be used for the grantor and others, depending on the trust design. Typically, the ILIT beneficiaries create a trust for the benefit of a larger class of beneficiaries outside of themselves or limit what they are entitled to, to protect the trust corpus.

There are a lot of ILITs out there and obviously maintaining them is the "easier" thing to do. I question however, if they still serve the goal of the client. Terminating these trusts and creating new, more user friendly trusts may ultimately have a better impact on the client and the plan they are trying to accomplish, the key question are you up to speed on helping them to accomplish this effectively and efficiently?

To learn more, join us for our Practice With Purpose Program, February 3-5th, in Charlotte, NC.

David J. Zumpano, Esq, CPA, Co-founder Lawyers With Purpose, Founder and Senior Partner of Estate Planning Law Center

Bigstock-Estate-Planning-Word-Circle-Co-60362105

Medicaid Planning For Previously Transferred Assets

January 20, 2015

by David Zumpano with No Comment Asset Protection Estate Planning Drafting Software Legal Technical

Many clients who come into my office in search of "qualifying for Medicaid" are concerned about losing their assets. Unfortunately, in many instances they got advice at the beauty shop or coffee shop (and sometimes a lawyer) to give their assets away so that they could be protected if sixty months goes by.

As we know, there is no rule that says a client has to wait 60 months, even if they transferred assets, and we are typically able to get clients qualified in much shorter periods of time, even in crisis. When preplanning, we are also able to protect between fifty and one hundred percent of assets immediately with the proper facts and planning. Understanding this level of planning requires a complete and thorough understanding of the 12 key Medicaid rules and how they apply to each client differently. For a demonstration of how the LWP industry exclusive software documents tally in minutes for any client fact pattern go to https://www.lawyerswithpurpose.com/Estate-Planning-Drafting-Software.php to schedule a software demo.

A key challenge for many clients who have already transferred assets is, how does it figure in in determining their eligibility now, in crisis, or later if they are preplanning. (The answer comes down to two distinctions.)

First, has the transfer been within the sixty months of when they come to see you? If so, the amount of the transfer should be added back to the client's assets as if they still owned them. That is the practical result when applying for Medicaid if within the sixty months of the application. Re-including the assets provides a proper picture of all assets of clients that have to be considered in determining how much can be protected and how much would be lost if the client is in crisis or will require long-term care within sixty months of the transfer.

After re-including the transferred assets, you must then calculate the amount of assets that will be protected and those that will be needed for care (in a crisis case), or, could be needed in a preplanning case, (if care is within sixty months). The key distinction actually comes down to funding. Pre‑transferred assets are a funding issue, not a calculation issue. After adding back the transferred assets and completing the calculations to determine the amount protected, then the first funding task is to allocate the previous transfer to the amount protected and then you only have to fund the balance. If the previous transfers are more than the amount of assets that could be protected, the family must make up for the excess transfer by giving it back (cure). If the amount previously transferred is less than the amount protected then the balance of the assets that can be protected, are thereafter transferred pursuant to the asset protection plan created by the attorney.

While complicated in the written word, with a proper understanding of the law and how to apply it to each client and when you have the software that calculates and supports the law and provides calculations in real time utilizing the Medicaid laws, you are able to confidently help your client protect their assets.

If you are interested in learning more about becoming a Lawyers With Purpose member, consider joining us for our Practice With Purpose Program in Charlotte, NC, February 3rd – 5th. We are almost at capacity and there are only a few seats left so register today!

David J. Zumpano, Esq, CPA, Co-founder Lawyers With Purpose, Founder and Senior Partner of Estate Planning Law Center